macdutton56
New member
@vigilantrogue I FEEL YOU. Rant incoming lol
WHY?
People are more likely to post when things are bad or they need help or they're frustrated. It becomes confirmation bias almost. For example, how often do you post when your husband is kind and amazing? Maybe you do, but generally - you don't need to! Your husband being kind and amazing is and should be the default. You don't need help with that or to ask questions or advice about it. It's just something that is. Just like you, when you're amazing to him. So it becomes confirmation bias in a way, with the bad husbands. They are naturally gonna be posted about more, because their wives need to be heard, need to vent, need assistance and advice.
STILL, WTF
That being said there ARE STILL way too many women with abusive husbands out there full stop. The posts are mind boggling. But for every post about an a-hole there's a loving husband out there too, not being posted about because no one needs to vent on his kind and supportive ass. I wish this was the case for everyone, but history and patriarchy still effect us so negatively.
I do wish the women on this sub could read their own posts sometimes and REALLY SEE what they are saying. You shouldn't have to negotiate caring for THEIR child, or his being kind to you, or spending time with the family. Any of these things not being present isn't good enough. We wouldn't get away with half of this shit (some women do, but it's less common)
THE BAR (needs to be waaaay higher)
Can you imagine if we had the babies, handed them to our husbands and then went to football games, did the bare (if that) minimum and essentially ghosted them in their own home after the biggest most important thing to ever happen to the family (a new baby)? IMAGINE if, right after they'd relinquished control over their body for 9 months, then spent a day with their balls being punched repetitively prior to expelling a human child from their pee hole, we had the audacity to pull that shit? The audacity to gaslight them for sex weeks after, when they weren't ready, whilst also refusing to do our part, clean or feed our own children? If you flip the roles it seems absurd. Because it is. Because it really truly is.
POSITIVE STUFF
My partner is an angel + labrador in human form. He almost carries the emotional labour for me, a sort of twist in gender roles. He's gorgeous, kind and looks after me like I look after him. I know that soulmate is a fairytale word, but I look at him and I see my everything. He's not a man, he's a human being. And the best kind of one at that. Of course he isn't without fault as a person, but when it comes to loving me and our family? He is flawless. Faults in other areas, value, drive and focus differences can always be discussed and compromised on. Caring for the one you love and doing MORE THAN the basic minimum for kids you brought into the world? NON. F*CKING. NEGOTIABLE. So help me god.
WHY?
People are more likely to post when things are bad or they need help or they're frustrated. It becomes confirmation bias almost. For example, how often do you post when your husband is kind and amazing? Maybe you do, but generally - you don't need to! Your husband being kind and amazing is and should be the default. You don't need help with that or to ask questions or advice about it. It's just something that is. Just like you, when you're amazing to him. So it becomes confirmation bias in a way, with the bad husbands. They are naturally gonna be posted about more, because their wives need to be heard, need to vent, need assistance and advice.
STILL, WTF
That being said there ARE STILL way too many women with abusive husbands out there full stop. The posts are mind boggling. But for every post about an a-hole there's a loving husband out there too, not being posted about because no one needs to vent on his kind and supportive ass. I wish this was the case for everyone, but history and patriarchy still effect us so negatively.
I do wish the women on this sub could read their own posts sometimes and REALLY SEE what they are saying. You shouldn't have to negotiate caring for THEIR child, or his being kind to you, or spending time with the family. Any of these things not being present isn't good enough. We wouldn't get away with half of this shit (some women do, but it's less common)
THE BAR (needs to be waaaay higher)
Can you imagine if we had the babies, handed them to our husbands and then went to football games, did the bare (if that) minimum and essentially ghosted them in their own home after the biggest most important thing to ever happen to the family (a new baby)? IMAGINE if, right after they'd relinquished control over their body for 9 months, then spent a day with their balls being punched repetitively prior to expelling a human child from their pee hole, we had the audacity to pull that shit? The audacity to gaslight them for sex weeks after, when they weren't ready, whilst also refusing to do our part, clean or feed our own children? If you flip the roles it seems absurd. Because it is. Because it really truly is.
POSITIVE STUFF
My partner is an angel + labrador in human form. He almost carries the emotional labour for me, a sort of twist in gender roles. He's gorgeous, kind and looks after me like I look after him. I know that soulmate is a fairytale word, but I look at him and I see my everything. He's not a man, he's a human being. And the best kind of one at that. Of course he isn't without fault as a person, but when it comes to loving me and our family? He is flawless. Faults in other areas, value, drive and focus differences can always be discussed and compromised on. Caring for the one you love and doing MORE THAN the basic minimum for kids you brought into the world? NON. F*CKING. NEGOTIABLE. So help me god.