Link to answer in the comments by @tjphipps - Leaving post up in case someone else needs to be pointed in the same direction.
Hello! My partner (25M) and I (29F) will have been trying 6 months (confirming O, OPKs, I have regular cycles, AMH 3.0ng/ml, Normal TSH/t4 free, normal prolactin - IUD use of 71 months after 5 years of BCP/Nuvaring) when this months cycle is inevitably also unsuccessful. I know it can take a year, but with so many people around me getting pregnant in the first 3-5 months of trying I’m REALLY not sold on the “try for a year” thing. It SEEMS to me like if you’re going to get pregnant unassisted, it’s going to happen in the first 6 months. Sure, there’s a small chance it could still happen before a year, but if you’re like me and you waited to try until you were 100% ready, that reduced chance in the last 6 months is not worth the stress that we all know comes with TTC.
This is not a negative Nancy post - I’m just really curious what’s so special about giving it six more months versus us going ahead and seeing the RE at the end of august. I, of course, have had ALL the testing and everything is normal. My husband wanted to wait a year to get an SA but after seeing how reduced the chances are after 6 months, I basically made this appointment to make him go ahead and get one.
If anyone has any info on this that’s more science-y, I’d LOVE to hear it! Is it a lining thing after being on birth control? Is it stress/do I want it TOO BAD?(this is a joke) is it egg quality? I’ve read ALL the BFP posts, all the wikis, and listening to ALL the podcasts but I can’t seem to find info on that middle ground - it’s all either super quick pregnancy or pursuing treatment.
I hope I’m making sense - y’all have been so helpful in the past for me!
Hello! My partner (25M) and I (29F) will have been trying 6 months (confirming O, OPKs, I have regular cycles, AMH 3.0ng/ml, Normal TSH/t4 free, normal prolactin - IUD use of 71 months after 5 years of BCP/Nuvaring) when this months cycle is inevitably also unsuccessful. I know it can take a year, but with so many people around me getting pregnant in the first 3-5 months of trying I’m REALLY not sold on the “try for a year” thing. It SEEMS to me like if you’re going to get pregnant unassisted, it’s going to happen in the first 6 months. Sure, there’s a small chance it could still happen before a year, but if you’re like me and you waited to try until you were 100% ready, that reduced chance in the last 6 months is not worth the stress that we all know comes with TTC.
This is not a negative Nancy post - I’m just really curious what’s so special about giving it six more months versus us going ahead and seeing the RE at the end of august. I, of course, have had ALL the testing and everything is normal. My husband wanted to wait a year to get an SA but after seeing how reduced the chances are after 6 months, I basically made this appointment to make him go ahead and get one.
If anyone has any info on this that’s more science-y, I’d LOVE to hear it! Is it a lining thing after being on birth control? Is it stress/do I want it TOO BAD?(this is a joke) is it egg quality? I’ve read ALL the BFP posts, all the wikis, and listening to ALL the podcasts but I can’t seem to find info on that middle ground - it’s all either super quick pregnancy or pursuing treatment.
I hope I’m making sense - y’all have been so helpful in the past for me!