girl4god86
New member
Background: I developed HELLP syndrome at 36+6 and had to get induced, baby was born healthy but on the smaller side and luckily didn't require NICU time. My platelets got so low that I couldn't get an epidural so I had a natural birth which I was completely unprepared for mentally. I also hemorrhaged 4 days later and had to go to the ER and got a D&C after bleeding for over 12 hours. Husband has been firmly OAD for years and before this baby I was starting to come around to it but deep down I wanted 2. Having those complications pretty much sealed the deal for my husband (99% OAD to 100%) and it helped me rationalize even further that we are a OAD family. We're pretty risk averse people to begin with so it really does not seem worth the risk to try for another. It could be fine but on the flip side there's now a higher chance of me and/or this next baby dying or requiring extra medical interventions. In the end I'd rather my daughter have me than a sibling.
Which brings me to a thought I have whenever I see or hear about people having one or more children after having serious complications - how are these people willing to risk it? I understand that pregnancy and childbirth are inherently risky and anything can happen, but when you have actual precedent that something could go wrong why would you risk it even one more time? Not sure if it's because I'm a little neurospicy but I can't wrap my head around it and it really bothers me. Anyone else wonder this or have theories?
Which brings me to a thought I have whenever I see or hear about people having one or more children after having serious complications - how are these people willing to risk it? I understand that pregnancy and childbirth are inherently risky and anything can happen, but when you have actual precedent that something could go wrong why would you risk it even one more time? Not sure if it's because I'm a little neurospicy but I can't wrap my head around it and it really bothers me. Anyone else wonder this or have theories?