@thankyoulord All the three magics? What are those supposed to be? Cuz my ancestors practiced slavic magic and as far as origins are traced it was a slavic thingy not middle eastern. Yes written records are from byzantine scholars but the practices come from my people
also i have heard of way more than "3 magics"
anyways...
How am i aupposed to prove something that was only seen by 3 people so their word is all we have? I am not bothered by the fact that you don't believe in something you never experienced, that's normal/common human reaction. But you can not claim something is BS just because you personally lack experience of it. Not when there are many people (this isnt the only story like this, some people actually managed to capture more compelling proves of their experiences) who went through this. If there are no other explanations (as i said this was not internal and she didn't have anything around her neck to leave prints) this is the only thing that makes sense and automatically calling it BS shows stupidity and ignorance.
I never had leg cramps, should i claim they don't exist and are BS? "But people really have them" yeah so they say, we don't believe in words soo no proof - cramps are BS, right?
see how stupid this is? You can say you don't believe in something because you personally never saw convincing evidence but you can not claim it to be false if you can not disprove the so many experiences of people, not explainable otherwise.
Just like i for example do not believe in god but i acknowledge historical records (which are just words of people mostly that sometimes allign with physical evidence) and i acknowledge sometimes odd "miracles" happen to people. Still doesn't make me believe there is all mighty god BUT i can not claim this is BS/impossible because well i can't disprove it no more than they can "prove it". That is a bold and ignorant claim. If someone claimed they can fly that is a lot less ambigous like you can easily prove/disprove. Or claim to be certain size etc. But thete are things that can not be proven or disproven for a fact and that's where we fill info by personal beliefs. It is important to understand this is not fact you can claim though. It is belief and yours is equally "right" as someone elses who believes differeny, until we can prove/disprove one/the other. Lack of recordings doesn't equal proof it doesn't exist. Many people in history were not recorded yet they existed
again if all these odd experiences of people can be explained by something else then yes that would disprove their words about it but as long as there is no better explanation this is a reasonable conclusion
There are many things that are POSSIBLE but not asured. You have right to believe whatnyou want but you can't claim something is not possible when there are enough instances about it to raise eyebrows at least (if not be convinced in believeing)
that was my issue here