@imark There is a lot of research pointing to feeding on demand (responsive feeding), both by breast and bottle, being better for babies and for continuing successful breastfeeding as long as one wants. Your MIL is suggesting feeding less frequently, which would be not feeding on demand.
This is a UNICEF document (UK based) that discusses responsive bottle feeding, which also includes paced feeding (which, when done correctly, allows baby to control how much milk
they want):
https://www.unicef.org.uk/babyfrien...osheet-Unicef-UK-Baby-Friendly-Initiative.pdf
And this is my go-to article on responsive feeding, so good:
https://www.unicef.org.uk/babyfrien...s-obsession-with-the-infant-feeding-interval/
It’s not peer reviewed research itself, but she does cite some sources.
Your MIL is also suggesting a crazy amount of milk per feeding. I can’t find any research on this specifically but in my training as a breastfeeding counsellor and every lactation consultant I’ve ever spoken to, the standard is always that most feeds are somewhere around 2-4oz - literally
half of what she’s suggesting. This makes sense given that the average milk intake is 25-30oz and average feeding interval is 2-3 hours. Babies who sleep long stretches at night might have bigger feeds before and/or after sleep. But cmon, 8oz is massive.
On average daily milk intake:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36763610/
Something that’s really working against us as breastfeeding parents is that our parents and grandparents received a lot of misinformation and misguided advice about infant feeding and nutrition, and the tides have turned on that in our generation. In your MIL’s day it probably was considered good and standard advice to give larger bottles and space out feeds. Now we know better so we do better. But it does often provide for some intergenerational tension, unfortunately.