Search results

@divineinfluence Did you see the fetal pole at 6 weeks? Were you sure of ovulation?

@divineinfluence We can agree to disagree. Measuring more than 1.5 weeks behind even at 6 weeks, assuming you know when you ovulated, is indeed a cause for concern. It doesn't mean it's definitely not viable, I agree. It's not a good sign, though. Edit: at 6 weeks you should be seeing a fetal...

@divineinfluence I made my comment based on all the info given, not just the US. Obviously, it's a possibility that the pregnancy is viable, which is why I never made an absolute statement (if you reread my first comment).

@divineinfluence I never said it's the same. But measuring 1.5 weeks behind at any point is more likely to end in loss than not. (Assuming dates aren't off, and OP got a first positive at 10 DPO, so at most, she could be 1 or 2 days earlier). She also had a beta that didn't double properly.

@retroman40a I didn't read this correctly the first time...when you said you were 6 weeks, I assumed you were counting from ovulation, not from your LMP. Based on your estimated ovulation plus the first positive test, you definitely weren't even 6 weeks at the ultrasound. 5 weeks and a few...

@retroman40a I appreciated the honesty when I was in this position, too. It fucking sucks, take care of yourself.

@retroman40a How sure are you about being 6 weeks? If there's no/little wiggle room with dates, it's likely going to be a loss. I'm so sorry. I measured 2 weeks behind at 8 weeks, it ended in a loss. I understand the pain. I'm hoping you're just earlier than you think.

@retroman40a What was the date of your first positive?

@ihaveagod Did you schedule a repeat beta and an ultrasound? I would like to reiterate that a faint positive at the beginning of the cycle is highly suspicious for an ectopic, especially given that you have a history of ectopic.