So, biodad and I have one son who’s 6. He was around for about 6 months after birth but then went into a drug and psychosis spiral. Our son hasn’t physically seen him since he was 1 and hasn’t had a video/phone call in over a year. He’s been in and out of prison several times over the last 5 years and struggled with drugs and mental illness so contact has been sporadic. He has a history with the law and has had undiagnosed mental illness(es) since childhood. He’s now in his mid 40s. We live in separate states. We only communicate in writing (text or email).
He recently shared that he’s been diagnosed with a mood disorder and psychosis disorder. I know he gets a shot once a month (for the last two months) for his illnesses and he sees a psychiatrist. He’s been working on his mental health for about 3 or 4 months since being released from prison this last time.
He’s asked previously to talk to our son; however, I’ve been reluctant because he hasn’t shown stability in maintaining that relationship as evidenced by irregular contact while in and out of prison). I found some resources online about developing a reunification plan that identifies requirements for maintaining contact (sobriety, staying on medication, sticking to a contact schedule, etc).
I initially asked him to take a drug test before we would establish audio or video contact but he’s indicated that is too traumatic at this point. I asked him if he’d used any illegal substances in the last 90 days and he ignored my question. I also suggested this might not be the right time to try this if he doesn’t have his mental health issues straightened out and I suggested he talk about it with his psychiatrist.
My question is related to drug use. I’ve read on several attorney sites that active addition can’t keep you from having contact with your child. Obviously, I understand this is different than physically being with the child unsupervised or taking care of the child. I’m wondering if I’m being too restrictive requiring a drug test before he talks to him on the phone or through video? My intent is not to be at all, but I want to also make sure I’m keeping my son safe and that includes trying to protect him from getting hurt unnecessarily. The court order gives me sole decision making authority when it comes to visitation so I’m at a loss. Both happy that I have that flexibility and frustrated that I’m not sure how to do this in the best way.
Thoughts?
He recently shared that he’s been diagnosed with a mood disorder and psychosis disorder. I know he gets a shot once a month (for the last two months) for his illnesses and he sees a psychiatrist. He’s been working on his mental health for about 3 or 4 months since being released from prison this last time.
He’s asked previously to talk to our son; however, I’ve been reluctant because he hasn’t shown stability in maintaining that relationship as evidenced by irregular contact while in and out of prison). I found some resources online about developing a reunification plan that identifies requirements for maintaining contact (sobriety, staying on medication, sticking to a contact schedule, etc).
I initially asked him to take a drug test before we would establish audio or video contact but he’s indicated that is too traumatic at this point. I asked him if he’d used any illegal substances in the last 90 days and he ignored my question. I also suggested this might not be the right time to try this if he doesn’t have his mental health issues straightened out and I suggested he talk about it with his psychiatrist.
My question is related to drug use. I’ve read on several attorney sites that active addition can’t keep you from having contact with your child. Obviously, I understand this is different than physically being with the child unsupervised or taking care of the child. I’m wondering if I’m being too restrictive requiring a drug test before he talks to him on the phone or through video? My intent is not to be at all, but I want to also make sure I’m keeping my son safe and that includes trying to protect him from getting hurt unnecessarily. The court order gives me sole decision making authority when it comes to visitation so I’m at a loss. Both happy that I have that flexibility and frustrated that I’m not sure how to do this in the best way.
Thoughts?