Search results

@monarchsmith So what are you saying?

@monarchsmith The FDA gives similar advice while also claiming there’s no link. https://www.fda.gov/radiation-emitting-products/cell-phones/children-and-teens-and-cell-phones#:~:text=Current%20scientific%20evidence%20does%20not,like%20to%20reduce%20RF%20exposure. Content current as of...

@acuriousgirl What is the behavior you’re trying to correct? 3.5 is a transitional age for children. A lot of studies on misbehavior are going to be on vulnerable populations (adopted/fostered, trauma, war populations, etc). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6862179/ So would you...

@monarchsmith They’re tips for people interested. They’re not saying it like they do safe sleep or feeding the baby every 2-3 hours. If this was a concern, pediatricians would be sending home fliers to parents. That’s like saying they “recommend” you don’t use wipes for pee...

@monarchsmith Yes, the same way I ignore the CDC’s advice to sanitize surfaces after every diaper change. Their main skin in the game is limited screen time...

@monarchsmith Their position is more research. This feels like when someone linked the CDC’s guide to changing diapers. These agencies are always going to err on the side of caution. That doesn’t mean phones are dangerous. They just can’t guarantee they are safe. Their main position is against...

@monarchsmith Link to specific positions, please?

@monarchsmith https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/radiation/cell-phones-fact-sheet They can’t definitively say “cell phones don’t cause cancer.” They can’t really say that about much. But if there was a link known, we’d hear about it.